Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.A. Sayed, J
Asianet Star Communications Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Competition Commission of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdictional conflict between trai and cci (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. allegations of abuse of dominant position (Para 5) |
| 3. initial orders and findings by the competition commission (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. arguments presented by petitioners regarding jurisdiction (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. adnpl's case on trai's regulatory scope (Para 12) |
| 6. citations on cci's investigative authority (Para 13) |
| 7. competition act's objectives and powers (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. different roles and jurisdictions of trai and cci (Para 18 , 21) |
2. Heard Mr Maninder Singh (Sr), Mr Jaiju Babu (Sr), Mr Santhosh Mathew (Sr), Ms Sneha Jain, Mr Ranjeet Singh Sidhu, Mr Prabhas Bajaj, learned Counsel for the petitioners; Mr N Venkataraman, learned Additional Solicitor General of India assisted by Mr Jaishankar V Nair, learned Central Government Counsel of Competition Commission of India and Mr Ritin Rai (Sr), Mr Avinash Amarnath, Mr Tarun Donadi, Mr Uday Bali, Mr Naman Golechha, Mr.Dayaar Singla, Mr Saji Varghese T G learned Counsel for the respondents.
3. Introduction:
The alleged conflict between the scope and jurisdiction of the authorities under the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Act 1997 and the Competition Commissi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
