Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MANOJ B NAIR, JAGADHEESH P.S, GOPAKUMAR K.N, SUNIL K.N, ANIL KUMAR P.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA, BIJU AYYAPAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case pertains to accusations being settled amicably. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court's acknowledgement of settlement and absence of objection. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. criteria for exercise of inherent powers in legal disputes. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 5 S.C. No.
1071/2023 of the file of the Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act, Ernakulam (‘Trial Court’, for short), which has originated from Crime No. 154/2021 registered by the Puthencruze Police Station, Ernakulam Rural, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 341, 451, 323 and 294(b) read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act , 1989.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure III affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
