Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.M. MANOJ, JJ
PADMAKUMAR P – Appellant
Versus
AMBILI T. JOSE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and background details. (Para 1) |
| 2. discussion on interim orders and their implications. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding delay and implications of intervention. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. examination of relevant case laws to resolve legal issues. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. constitutional provisions related to disqualification. (Para 14) |
| 6. final decision on the appeal against the interim order. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. analysis of interim relief versus legislative intent. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The 3rd respondent in W.P.(C)No.40294 of 2025 is before this Court in this writ appeal, invoking the provisions under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 , challenging the interim order dated 11.10.2025 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition, which was one filed by the 1st respondent herein, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P7 order dated 23.10.2025 of the 2nd respondent State Election Commission in O.P.No.8 of 2023, which was one filed by the appellant herein, invoking the provisions under Section 4 of the Kerala Loca
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
