IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
Jomy Joseph S/o Chandy Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Varghese Thomas S/o Thomas – Respondent
W.A. Nos. 2738, 2740 of 2025
Decided On : 20-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction of the court under the kerala high court act. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. final determination of appeal and stay orders. (Para 3 , 8 , 35) |
| 3. constitutional validity and implications of the defection act. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal consequences of interim orders on elections. (Para 17 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
1. These writ appeals filed under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 arise out of the interim order dated 13.11.2025 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)Nos.33894 of 2025 and 33995 of 2025. The appellant is the 3rd respondent in those writ petitions. W.A.No.2738 of 2025 arises out of the order dated 13.11.2025 in W.P.(C)No.33894 of 2025, whereas W.A.No.2740 of 2025 arises out of the order dated 13.11.2025 in W.P.(C)No.33995 of 2025.
2. In the writ petitions filed by the 1st respondent- petitioner, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , a writ of certiorari is sought for against the common order dated 05.08.2025 of the Kerala State Election Commission in O.P.Nos.59 and 60 of 2025. The order in O.P.No.59 of 2025 is under challenge in W.P.(C)No.33894 of 2025 and the order in O.P.No.60 of 2025 is under challenge in W.P.(C)No.33995 of 2025.
3. The 1st respondent in W.A.No.2738 of 2025, who is the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.33894 of 2025, is an elected representative of Ward No.33 of Changanassery Municipality, who is disqualified by Ext.P3 order dated 05.08.2025 of the State Election Commission in O.P.No.59 of 2023. Similarly, the 1st respondent in W.A.No.2740 of 2025, who is the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.33995 of 2025, is an elected representative of Ward No.17 of Changanassery Municipality, who is disqualified by the order dated 05.08.2025 in O.P.No.60 of 2023.
4. O.P.No.59 of 2023 was filed by the appellant in W.A.No.2738 of 2025, who is a Councillor in Ward No.7 of Changanassery Municipality, invoking the provisions under Sections 3 and 4(1) of the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999 (for brevity ‘the Defection Act’), seeking a declaration that the respondent therein has become subject to disqualification under both limbs and the provisions of the Defection Act, who committed defection and is disqualified to continue as a Councillor of Changanassery Municipality. A declaration was also sought that the respondent therein is disqualified to contest in any election to the local bodies for a period of 6 years. A copy of O.P.No.59 of 2025 is marked as Ext.P1 in W.P.(C)No.33894 of 2025. In the original petition, the respondent therein filed an objection, which is marked as Ext.P2. O.P.No.60 of 2023 was filed by the appellant in W.A.No.2740 of 2025, seeking similar declarations in respect of the respondent therein. A copy of O.P.No.60 of 2025 is marked as Ext.P1 in W.P.(C)No.33995 of 2025. In the original petition, the respondent therein filed an objection, which is marked as Ext.P2.
5. Before the State Election Commission, on the side of the petitioner in O.P.Nos.59 of 2025 and 60 of 2025, PWs 1 to 7 were examined and Exts.A1 to A23 were marked. On the side of the respondent, RWs 1 to 5 were examined and Ext.B1 was marked. Exts.X1 to X5 were marked through the Secretary of the Municipality. After considering the pleadings and evidence on record, the State Election Commission by Ext.P3 order dated 05.08.2025 allowed O.P.Nos.59 and 60 of 2023, and the respondent therein is declared as disqualified for being a Councillor of Changanassery Municipality, as provided under Section 3 (1)(a) of the Defection Act. The respondent therein is further declared as disqualified from contesting as a candidate in an election to any local authorities for a period of 6 years from the date of that order, as provided under Section 4 (3) of the said Act. Challenging the order dated 05.08.2025 of the State Election Commission, which is marked as Ext.P3 in the respective writ petitions, the 1st respondent in these writ appeal
The interim order granting stay on disqualification under the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act impacts democratic processes and is subject to appellate review.
The validity of service of a party whip is crucial for disqualification under the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act; improper consideration of such service undermines due proces....
Service of a political party whip is deemed effective under the General Clauses Act when properly addressed and posted, presuming the recipient's awareness of its contents.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the fundamental principle of democracy that elected representatives must represent the will of the electorate and cannot change their stand against....
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of Rule 8(7)(a) of the Kerala Municipality (Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson) Rules 1995, which mandates drawing lots and decla....
Election - Disqualification on ground of defection - Petitioner has violated the whip and invited the impugned order. Violation alleged in terms of Section 4 with regard to 24 hours as held by this C....
The court held the Election Commission lacks authority to annul post-election results, emphasizing disputes must be resolved in civil court per Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.
A member of local authority is disqualified upon violating party whip, regardless of subsequent elections. Disqualification decision operates from the date of declaration by the Election Commission.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.