Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THASLIMA MUHMINATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed to quash proceedings and request reconsideration of appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. hearing conducted for the petitioner's arguments. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs reconsideration and maintains abeyance on prior proceedings. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. To issue a writ of certiorari or appropriate writ order or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit P3 and to quash the same;
ii. To issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ order or direction directing the 3rd Respondent to re-consider Exhibit P2 Form-6 application filed by the petitioner within a time frame;
iii. To issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ order or direction directing the 2nd Respondent to consider Exhibit P5 appeal filed by the petitioner after affording an opportunity for hearing within a time frame;
iv. To grant such other relief as this Hon’ble Court deem fit to grant in the interest of justice.
(SIC)
2. Aggrieved by Ext.P3, the petitioner filed Ext.P5 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner submitted that there may be a direction to consider Ext.P5 appeal, and till then, further proceedings based on Ext.P3 may be kept i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
