Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
VAZAPOIL MAHAMOOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. statutory prayers for quashing orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's hearing on petitioner's grievances. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's findings on non-compliance with statutory requirements. (Para 4) |
| 4. necessity of independent assessment for agricultural land. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i)Call for the records leading to Ext.P7 & P8 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari finding that they are illegal.
ii)issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to reconsider and pass orders on Form 5 application dehors the finding in Ext.P7 & P8 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, within a time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iii)Declare that the property of the petitioner lying in
21.24 Ares of land lying in Re.Sy. No.6/116 (old Sy No. 134/ A2B) of Thiruvangad Village in Thalassery Taluk in Block No.115 Kannur District is not a paddy land and is liable to be excluded from the data bank.
iv)Dispense with filing of translation of vernacular documents.
v)issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
