Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
MOHAMED RASAL K – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH INDIAN BANK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner challenges the bank's freezing of his account. (Para 1) |
| 2. the bank's actions based on police requisition and bank dues. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court establishes past guidelines for account freezing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. bank must provide transaction details to account holder. (Para 7) |
| 5. court's final directions regarding freezing and communication. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 29th day of November, 2025
1. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the debit freezing/lien of his Bank account with the Respondent/Bank at the requisition of the Police Authorities. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner is not an accused in the Crime registered by the Police authorities against some other persons, in which the requisition was made; that the Petitioner is in no way connected with the said Crime; and that the debit freezing/lien of the account is in violation of Sections 106 & 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ) and
2. The learned Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after getting instructions from the Bank, confirmed that the Bank has received a Requisition from the Respon
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
