Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
PARVATHI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner contests rejection of application regarding land classification. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent states procedural adherence in issuing rejection. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court notes deficiencies in the procedural assessment. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. citations reinforce the need for rigorous consideration of land status. (Para 8) |
| 5. court orders reconsideration of form 5 application with appropriate evaluations. (Para 9) |
| 6. final ruling directs further inquiries and findings. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P7 order whereby the Form 5 application submitted by the petitioner has been rejected.
2. Petitioner submits that he has in absolute ownership and possession of 0.0809 hector of land in Re-survey No. 229/21(229/10) in Block No. 12 of Kuthanur-I Village, Alathur Taluk in Palakkad district. Though, the property has been classified as ‘Nilam’, as per the revenue records, it was kept as “barren land” without any cultivation for the last so many years and thereupon the Local Level Monitoring Committee after a detailed enquiry decided not to include the petitioner’s property in the Data Bank. Thereupon, petitioner applied for permission for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
