Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
TATA REALTY AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD – Appellant
Versus
RIA THOMAS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to dismissal of consumer complaint (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding maintainability of writ petition (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on jurisdiction and statutory remedies (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. outcome of the appeal (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present intra-court appeal, filed under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, assails the judgment dated 12.06.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 26226 of 2024, whereby the writ petition was disposed of by setting aside Ext. P7 order of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram, in Complaint No. 9/2021, with a direction to the Commission to restore the complaint to file and consider it on merits after hearing all the parties concerned.
2. The appellants herein were respondents Nos. 1 and 2 in the writ petition, whereas the first respondent herein was the petitioner, and respondents Nos. 2 to 15 herein were respondents Nos. 3 to 16 in the writ petition.
3. Respondents Nos. 3 to 14 had approached the 15th respondent by filing Complaint Case No. 9/2021. Vide Ext. P7 order dated 21.03.2024, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram, dismi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
