Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ROBIN @ MUVAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to order under bnss due to absence of notice to petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. arguments highlight failure to issue proper pre-proceeding notices. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations emphasize the necessity of procedural safeguards. (Para 5 , 7 , 9) |
| 4. legal precedent reinforces need for sufficient grounds and transparency. (Para 8 , 10) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 2ND KARTHIKA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 9457 OF 2025 CRIME NO.449/2025 OF Ernakulam Central Police Station, Ernakulam AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN MC NO.654 OF 2025 OF SUB DIVISIONAL COURT,FORT COCHIN PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER:
ROBIN @ MUVAD AGED 27 YEARS S/O. PUSHPANANDHAN, KURUNGOTTUKUDIYIL HOUSE, MOKKERI KURARA, P. O. MOKKERI, KANNUR,, PIN - 670692 BY ADVS.
SRI.K.R.VINOD SMT.M.S.LETHA SMT.ATHIRA K.S.
SMT.M S MALAVIKA RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI –, PIN - 682031 PP SRI M P PRASANTH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
24.10.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
C.S.DIAS, J ---------------------
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
