Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.TH, JJ
DR.GEORGE MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to earlier service benefit decisions due to termination and service eligibility. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. lack of timely action undermines claims related to service benefits. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.22218 of 2020 filed this writ appeal under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, challenging the judgment dated 14.02.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition.
2. W.P.(C) No.22218 of 2020 is one filed by the appellant under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) To call for the records leading to Ext.P7, P8, P16, P20 and P27 orders from the Respondents and issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, Order or direction quashing Ext.P7, P8 and P16 orders declining to reckoned the period from 01.06.1992 to 31.05.1995 and 03.11.2997 to 02.11.1999 for service benefits of the Petitioner and Ext.P20 Order of the 6th Respondent terminating the service of the Petitioner from St.Berchman's College, Changanaserry to the post of Selection Grade Lecturer, Chemistry Department with effect from 05.09.2001 and Ext.P27 order declining to calculate total 21
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
