IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
BASIL P THANKARAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner purchased a Maruti Swift car on 20.02.2025 with the intention of obtaining a fancy registration number, and showed his interest in the number KL 44 J 8282. The petitioner also remitted Rs.3,000/- as the reserve price notified for the registration. He had also engaged his friend to participate in the bidding. There was another person who participated in the bidding, and the petitioner's friend quoted an amount of Rs.42,000/- and became the highest bidder. Accordingly, the petitioner was bound to remit Rs.39,000/-, as he had already remitted Rs.3,000/-.
2. The petitioner submits that he made a request on
02.07.2025 before the Joint RTO, Kothamangalam, to act in terms of Circulars G.O.(P) No.3/2011/Trans and G.O.(P) No.64/2015/Trans and Rule 95 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules , 1989 and to cancel the participation in the auction and forfeit the amount which the petitioner had already paid to the SRTO. The officer refused to proceed according to the Government order, as there is no provision to cancel the reserved bid number and also no such provision in M-Parivahan to accommodate such a request. The petitioner had also preferred an application under the RTI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.