IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
K.P. VELAYUDHAN – Appellant
Versus
K.P. BALAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the injunctive claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal arguments presented by both parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. analysis of easement claims based on evidence. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. final court decision on the appeal. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
The plaintiff in a suit for injunction, has come up in this appeal aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the Sub Court, Tirur, reversing the judgment and decree granted in his favour by the Munsiff Court, Parappanangadi, in O.S.No.22/2004.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:
2.1. The plaint ‘A’ schedule property along with other holdings originally belonged to Velukutty, who is the father of the plaintiff. He executed a Settlement Deed No.2909/1993 in favour of his wife and children. Item Nos.1 and 2 were set apart to Cherai and Appunni. Item Nos.3 and 4 were set apart to his wife Malu and their children, Balan, Sreedharan, Velayudhan, Raman, Prema, Unni, Sivan and Visala. The said item is mentioned in the plaint as ‘A’ schedule. The plaintiff, along with his mother and other members, except the defendant, is residing in the house in plaint ‘A’ schedule. It is further stated that he is using the plaint
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.