Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
ADUVATTIL RAMESH BABU – Appellant
Versus
EDAVATTANA POYIL SUNILKUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals and suits involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's interpretation of property rights and legal documents. (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. arguments on property ownership and nature of documents. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final judgment and legal rulings on property classification. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
These appeals arise from a common Judgment in A.S No. 24 of 2006 and A.S No. 27 of 2006 on the files 0f Sub Court Kozhikode. Three suits were tried together. One preferred by the appellants for injunction against the respondents, another by the respondents 1 and 2 in R.S.A No. 1029 of 2011 for partition of plaint schedule property and the last one by the father of the above respondents for cancellation of the sale deed executed by him in favour of the appellants. The suit for injunction was decreed, while the other suits were dismissed. Two appeals were preferred by the respondents. As against the dismissal of the third suit, no appeal was preferred.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of these appeals are as follows:-
One Chandu had various extents of property in his hold. Chandu derived Jenmom rights over the property from a Nair Tha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
