ORDER

The petitioner is the counter petitioner in M.C.No.461/2025 pending before the Court of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Fort Cochin.

2. The petitioner has been served with Annexure-I order calling upon her to attend the Court and to execute a cash bond for Rs.1,00,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount for keeping peace for a period of one year as contemplated under Section 129 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘ BNSS ’, in short). The petitioner contends that Annexure-I order is unsustainable in law because the Sub Divisional Magistrate has not set forth the substance of the information in the said order, which is mandatory under Section 126 read with Section 130 of the , and the law laid down by this Court in Moidu vs. State of Kerala ( 1982 KHC 139 ). Therefore, Annexure-I order may be quashed.

3. Heard; Smt.Ipsita Ojal, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M.P. Prasanth, the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. In the above context it is necessary to refer to Sections 126 and 130 of the BNSS , which corresponds to the erstwhile Sections 107 and 111 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,which reads as follows:

126. (1) When an Executive Magistrate r