Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, SYAM KUMAR V.M., JJ
A.CHANDRAKUMARAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's findings on the legitimacy of retrospective contributions. (Para 3 , 19) |
| 3. arguments presented by review petitioners regarding factual inaccuracies. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 21) |
| 4. court's assessment of the grounds for review not warranting changes. (Para 8 , 20 , 24) |
| 5. standards for maintaining a review petition under cpc. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
ORDER
Dated this the 09th day of January, 2026
Syam Kumar V.M., J.
This Review Petition is filed seeking to review the judgment dated 21.07.2025 in W.A.No.852 of 2022. Review Petitioners were respondents 1 to 67 in the said Writ Appeal.
2. The Writ Appeal was filed by respondents 1 to 3 challenging the judgment dated 28.03.2022 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.7801 of 2020 inter alia directing respondents 1 to 3 to encash the DD deposited by the 4th respondent towards alleged deficiency and arrears and thereafter to issue a letter for details of the alleged arrears by providing record of the employees and other registers maintained in the office, including the Employees Provident Fund numbers assigned to the employees. It was also directed that after scrutiny
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
