SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 956

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
KERALA KABADDI ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1209 OF 2024 | WP(C) NO. 12827 OF 2024 | WP(C) NO. 43510 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO. 41455 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.K. MURALEEDHARAN, MANOJ.P, SHIBU K PAUL, A.PREMKUMAR, JASMIN CS, SUJA .AA, SHARMI ULAHANNAN, JAYAKUMAR . A, P. MANESH, SHIJITH MK, RAJKUMAR R., ATHULYA TR, SALEESH TS, MUKUNDAN UNNI, KHADERKUTTY U
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA, A. MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA, LATHA ANAND, KALA T.GOPI, KAILESH T.GOPI, NISHITHA BALACHANDRAN, T.C.GOVINDASWAMY, RAJIV JYOTHISH GEORGE

The court affirmed the authority of the Sports Council to conduct elections for sports associations, prioritizing public interest and player participation over internal factional disputes.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Sports Act, 2000 - Powers and roles of the Kerala Sports Council in relation to sports associations and their elections. The petitioners, various Kabaddi associations, challenged the orders of the Kerala Sports Council to conduct elections and appoint technical committees for Kabaddi tournaments. Writ petitions highlighted factionalism within the associations affecting the game, raising issues regarding the authority of the Sports Council under the Act. (Paras 1, 9, 13)

(B) The court found that the Sports Council is best suited to organize and conduct elections, ensuring players' interests in tournament participation, weighing public interest against private interests. Citing a previous ruling, it was emphasized that the courts should uphold justice while considering all facts surrounding the elections. W.P.

(C).Nos.1209, 12827, and 43510 of 2025 were dismissed, while W.P.

(C) No.41455 of 2024 was closed as infructuous. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, representing multiple Kabaddi associations in Kerala, contested the decisions made by the Kerala Sports Council regarding the organization of elections and the conduct of tournaments amidst ongoing disputes and factionalism affecting the sport's governance. (Paras 1, 5)

Findings of Court:
The Sports Council has been granted the authority to conduct elections as per the interests of the sport and public, in absence of current elected bodies in the associations, and recognizing the need for immediate action to facilitate tournaments for players. (Paras 13)

Issues: Whether the Sports Council has the authority to conduct elections for Kabaddi associations and the implications of delayed elections on players’ opportunities in the sport. (Paras 13)

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the public interest should take precedence in facilitating the elections overseeing the sports associations, emphasizing the need for regulatory mechanisms and timely action by the Sports Council. (Paras 13)

Result: W.P.

(C).Nos.1209 of 2024, 12827 of 2024 and 43510 of 2025 are dismissed. W.P.

(C) No.41455 of 2024 is closed as infructuous.

Table of Content
1. overview of case background and association disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. legal arguments and perspectives regarding elections and authority. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's rationale for prioritizing the sports council's role. (Para 12)
4. final judicial opinion affirming the authority of the sports council. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT

'Kabaddi' is a team sport where a raider from one team will enter the opponent's half of the court to tag defenders and return, while the defenders try to tackle the raider to earn points for their team. Here, the raids are by an Association formed for the betterment of the game of Kabaddi in Kerala, and its members, driven by factionalism. Their foray to the High Court continues unabated, while the actual players, whose future is at stake, are made to wait in the wings.

2. The essential facts are detailed below. For convenience, the parties and the documents are described as in W.P. (C).No.12827 of 2024.

3. The 1st petitioner Association is a body registered under the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955. The primary purpose of the Association is to popularise, propagate and promote the game of Kabaddi in Kerala. The Association is affiliated to the Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India ('AKFI' for short) and is recognised by the Kerala Sports Council, which is the apex body. The last election of the office bearers of the 1st petitioner Association was conducted on 10.11.2020. Although the Sports Council had earlier suspended the recognition of the 1st petitioner Association citing various grounds, pursuant to the election on 10.11.2020, the suspension was withdrawn as per Ext.P3 proceedings. The 4th respondent, who was the Secretary of the 1st petitioner Association earlier, challenged Ext.P3 by filing W.P. (C).No.7236 of 2021. While the writ petition was pending, the Sports Council, considering the stalemate prevailing due to the pendency of the litigation, issued Ext.P5 order dated 20.10.2023 constituting a technical committee for conducting Kabaddi competitions at various levels and to select the teams for participating in championships. In the light of Ext.P5 order, W.P.(C).No.7236 of 2021 was decided as per Ext.P6 judgment and the following directions issued;

“In the afore circumstances:

(a) This writ petition is ordered, recording that Ext.P38 order dated 20.10.2023 has been issued by the Kerala Sports Council ; and thus allowing the Technical Committee to act in terms of the directions therein.

(b) The Kerala Sports Council will hear all the parties to this case and take a decision as to who have to be recognized and in what manner. They will also be at liberty to decide whether fresh elections are to be called and the modalities for the same as per the Bye-laws of the Association and such other applicable Rules and Regulations. A final decision in this regard, either way, shall be taken by the Sports Council not later than four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.”

4. Later, the Sports Council issued Ext.P7 constituting Technical Committees at the district level for conduct of District Tournaments and selection of the official teams. This was followed by Ext.P13 order dated 12.03.2024, deciding to take necessary steps for conducting election of the 1st petitioner Association as directed in Ext.P6 judgment.

5. The challenge in W.P.(C).No.1209 of 2024 filed by the Association is against the orders of the Sports Council constituting Technical Committees for conducting tournaments and to select teams. The challenge in W.P.(C).No.12827 of 2024 is against Ext.P13 order. W.P.(C).No.43510 of 2025 is filed by a retired Kabaddi coach, seeking a direction to the AKFI to constitute an ad hoc committee to ensure free and fair election to the Kerala Kabaddi Association within a time frame, in view of the failure of the Sports Council to conduct the elections despite the directions in Ext.P6 judgment. W.P.(C).No.4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top