Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
UNNIKRISHNAN NAMBOOTHIRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's assessment of passport validity necessity. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal representation statements made during hearings. (Para 3) |
| 3. assessment of prior court directive on passport reissuance. (Para 4) |
| 4. modification based on reasonable requests related to trial participation. (Para 5) |
C.S.DIAS,J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Crl. M.C.No. 71 of 2026 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 16th day of January, 2026 O R D E R The petitioners are the accused 1 and 3 in C.C.No.112 of 2016 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ernakulam ('Trial Court', in short), which has originated from Crime No.1225 of 2015 registered by the Central Police Station, Ernakulam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 120B , 406, 420 and
477A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioners state that they are husband and wife and are residing in Bosania and Montenegro. The petitioners have valid Indian passports. The 1st petitioner's passport is valid till 21.08.2029 and the 2nd petitioner's passport is valid till 31.05.2027. However, the pages of the passport are exha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
