Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NASEEMA AGED 61 YEARS W/O MOIDEEN KOYA POTTAYIL TAZHAM P.O VENGERI KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673010 – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayers in writ petition related to land conservation matters. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by counsel regarding statutory requirements. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's observations on procedural deficiencies. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's rationale rooted in precedent. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing Ext. P7.
ii. To issue a declaration declaring that the property covered by Ext. P1 is a reclaimed land prior to Wet Land Act, 2008 iii. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing 2 nd respondent to reconsider Ext. P4 application a fresh.
iv. Issue any such other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper considering the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.
v. To Dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
(SIC)
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by them under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
