IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUJEEB P V – Appellant
Versus
THE VILLAGE OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"I. Issue a writ of certiorari and quash Exhibit P-2 mahazar and its all further proceedings.
ii. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release vehicle belongs to petitioner bearing registration No. KL-36 C 6832, forthwith.
iii. Issue a Writ of mandamus or other appropriate Writ Direction or Order, declaring that the seizure of the petitioner’s vehicle effected by the 1st respondent on the basis of the Exhibit P-2 will not come under the purview of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act , 2008.
iv. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the
1st respondent to finalize the proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P-2 mahazar taking into account Exhibits P-3 to P-5 within a time limit.
v. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to forward entire report to the 3rd respondent with respect to the seizure of the petitioner vehicle on the basis of the Exhibit P-2 mahazar forthwith, if it is not already forwarded and direct the 3rd respondent to release the petitioner’s vehicle on interim custody.
vi. To dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents. And vii. Issue s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.