Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
DELEEPKUMAR K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rejection of petitioner's promotion request. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. promotion decisions are subject to the tribunal's assessment. (Para 4 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 3. respondents cite rules on promotion and pending cases. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. proper procedures must be followed in promotions. (Para 20 , 23) |
| 5. tribunal's order is upheld, petition dismissed. (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT
[O.P.(KAT) Nos.260 OF 2023, 262 OF 2023]
Muralee Krishna S., J.
The petitioner, who is the applicant in O.A.(EKM) Nos. 1096 of 2020 and 3013 of 2017 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short), filed these original petitions, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the common order dated 14.02.2023 passed by the Tribunal in those original applications.
O.P.(KAT)No.260 of 2023
2. Going by the averments in O.A.(EKM)No.1096 of 2020 from which the above Original Petition arose, the petitioner, who was promoted as a Motor Vehicle Inspector on 12.07.2017, is ahead of his promotion as Joint Regional Transport Officer, from 2017 onwards. He is serial number 4 in Annexure A1 provisional seniority lis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
