Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
DELEEPKUMAR K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rejection of petitioner's promotion request. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. promotion decisions are subject to the tribunal's assessment. (Para 4 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 3. respondents cite rules on promotion and pending cases. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. proper procedures must be followed in promotions. (Para 20 , 23) |
| 5. tribunal's order is upheld, petition dismissed. (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna S., J.
O.P.(KAT)No.260 of 2023
“(a) To call for the records leading to issue Annexures A1 and A9, and A10 orders, and to quash Annexures A9 and A10 orders, to the extent of non-consideration of the claim of the applicant for promotion to the post of Joint Regional Transport Officer, on the basis of his seniority in Annexure A1.
(c) To direct the 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents to consider the claim of the applicant for promotion to the post of Joint Regional Transport Officer, in terms of his seniority in Annexure A1, and accordingly to grant promotion to the applicant, forthwith, as per law.”
“5.As per Rule 28(b)(i) of Part II General Rules of Kerala State & Subordinate Service Rules Appointments to posts in a selection category or grade in a service or class, other than Heads of Departments which sh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
