Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
KUNNIL SAMUEL BABU – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeking correction in land classification. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hears arguments from both parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs consideration of the request. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order commanding the 1st respondent to take necessary follow- up action pursuant to Exhibit.P6 representation and to effect correction in the Data Bank entry by excluding the entire extent of 15.70 Ares comprised in Sy. No.112/12 and Sy. No.112/5 of land in Puliyoor Village, Chengannur Taluk, Alappuzha District, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
(ii) Petitioner may be permitted to dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents.
And (iii) To pass such orders or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice.” [SIC]
2. The petitioner obtained Ext.P5 order in a Form-5 application filed in accordance with Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008. It is the case of the petitioner that, on perusal of Ext.P5 order, it is revealed that, though the total extent of 15.70 Ares was excluded by the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
