Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAKKEER P.M. – Appellant
Versus
MUDAKUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal standards for maintaining a writ petition and implications for alternative remedies. (Para 1 , 6) |
| 2. observations on environmental compliance and noise pollution assessments. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Call for the records pertaining to Ext.P12 order of the
1st Respondent and setaside the same by issuing a writ of Certiorari finding that the same is illegal and against the Kerala Panchayat Raj (Issue of Licence to Dangerous and Offensive Trades and Factories) Rules,1996.
ii) dispense with filing of the translation of documents in Malayalam produced in the above writ petition as Ext.P6, Ext.P9, Ext.P10, Ext.P12 and Ext.P13.
iii) Pass such other writs, orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deems just, fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of this case. And iv) Allow this Writ petition with cost.”[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration before this Court on 03.03.2023, this Court passed the following order:
“The petitioner shall implead the Inspector of Factories and Boilers as party to this writ petition. Issue notice to respondents 1,2,4,5,6 and 7. The learned Gov
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
