Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Suresh K – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of Kollam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition initiation and claims. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's approach to statutory compliance. (Para 3) |
| 3. implications of statuary limitations. (Para 5 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. discussion on legal precedents and limitations. (Para 6 , 9 , 13) |
| 5. final adjudgment on appeal authority. (Para 11 , 12 , 15) |
| 6. conclusion on writ petition and time extension. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J.
This Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. issue a writ in the nature of certiorari calling for the records culminated in the issuance of Ext.P5 notice and quash the same.
ii. Issue an order staying all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 iii. issue such other order or direction, as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper to grant."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner herein is the absolute owner in possession of a property comprised in re survey No. 722 of Kollam East Village, having an extent of 1 Are 65 Sq Meters. The 2nd respondent is the petitioner's neighbour. The 2nd respondent’s residential property and the petitioner's property are separated and demarcated by a compound wall, is the submission. It is the case of the petitioner that there is a small toilet situated within t
Statutory timelines for appeals under local government legislation cannot be bypassed by filing writ petitions after the period has expired.
The High Court cannot entertain a writ petition against an appealable order if the statutory period for filing an appeal has expired, reaffirming that adherence to statutory limitations is essential ....
Writ petitions filed after statutory limitation periods are not maintainable; judicial review cannot circumvent legislative timelines.
The High Court cannot exercise writ jurisdiction if the statutory period for appealing has expired, reinforcing adherence to legislative intent regarding statutory limitations.
Writ petitions cannot be entertained when an appealable order exists under the applicable statute, emphasizing the necessity of exhausting alternative remedies.
A Writ Petition cannot be entertained if an appeal is available under the statute, unless filed within the limitation period.
The court confirmed the right to appeal and the potential to condone delays under the Kerala Municipality Act, mandating reconsideration of the case based on legal precedents.
The court confirmed the appealability of the order under Section 406(3) of the Kerala Municipality Act and permitted time for the appellant to appeal.
The High Court cannot entertain a writ petition when the statutory period for appeal has expired, emphasizing the importance of availing alternative remedies.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
