JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“i. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders the application dated 15.05.2027, the subject matter of Ext. P4 and P6, without compliance of the provisions under the provisions of Kerala Construction of Paddyland and Wetland (Amended Act), 2018. Amendment Act in the light of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Hon’ble Court cited supra;

ii. To declare that the 2nd respondent is bound to consider the application of the petitioner filed under Clause 6(2) Kerala Land Utilization Order , 1967, subject matter of Ext. P4 and P16 without insisting, compliance of the provisions under Amendment Act in the light of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Hon’ble Court. Viz; Tahsildar Vs. Ranjith George (2025 KHC 7012) and Mukthar Ali Vs.

State of Kerala ( 2024 (6) KHC 187 )

iii. issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to Ext.P6 and to quash the original of the same;

iv. declare that the revenue authorities are bound to reassess the subject property of the petitioner and effect consequential changes in the nature of the