IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K V JOSE – Appellant
Versus
THODUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial findings impact municipal decision-making. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. judicial precedents must guide building permit considerations. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order, to call the records leading to Ext-P6 application and Ext-P9 and P.10 order/proceedings and to quash Ext-P9 and P.10 proceedings;
ii. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to grant building permit as per Ext-P6 Application by considering it afresh, in the light of the Ext-P2 Judgment and without insisting for order from RDO under section 27(A) of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act ;
iii. Issue an order declaring that the order from RDO under Sec. 27(A) of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act is not required for granting building permit to the petitioners in view of Ext-P.2 judgment;
iv. Issue any other writ or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(SIC)
2. Petitioners are the joint owners of the property covered by Ext.P1 sale certificate and they are the aucti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.