JUDGMENT

The above writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P5 stop memo and Ext.P10 notice. The petitioner has also sought for other consequential reliefs.

2. It is averred that the petitioner is the absolute owner is in possession of properties having an extent of 2 Acres 32 cents comprised in various survey numbers of Nattika Village, which is essentially a coconut plantation. The properties are classified as reclaimed land in the data bank and as Nilam in the revenue records. While so, the petitioner applied for a building permit before the 4^th respondent and the same was rejected for the reason that the property is classified as Nilam in the revenue records and that building permit can be issued only upon getting an order under Rule 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order . Thereupon the petitioner preferred an application dated 08.08.2016 seeking permission under Rule 6 of the before the 2^nd respondent, which was ultimately granted as per Ext.P2 order dated 08.02.2017. By Ext.P2, the 4^th respondent was directed to grant permit for construction of house/building in the aforesaid properties. Thereupon the petitioner submitted an application for building permit, which was gran