Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SHINE BHASKARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of ownership and application for permits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's authority and interim orders on permits. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal framework governing land utilization. (Para 5) |
| 4. direction to authorities regarding permit processes. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P5 stop memo and Ext.P10 notice. The petitioner has also sought for other consequential reliefs.
2. It is averred that the petitioner is the absolute owner is in possession of properties having an extent of 2 Acres 32 cents comprised in various survey numbers of Nattika Village, which is essentially a coconut plantation. The properties are classified as reclaimed land in the data bank and as Nilam in the revenue records. While so, the petitioner applied for a building permit before the 4th respondent and the same was rejected for the reason that the property is classified as Nilam in the revenue records and that building permit can be issued only upon getting an order under Rule 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order . Thereupon the petitioner preferred an application dated 08.08.2016 seeking permission under Rule 6 of the before the 2nd respondent, which was ult
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
