IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
INDULEKHA R – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : i) "Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash Exhibit P4 order of the 2nd respondent.
ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent or the officer authorised under Section 2(XVA) of ‘ The Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 ’ to re- consider Exhibit P3 Form 6 application filed by the petitioner, after calling forward the satellite maps and fresh reports, and also after hearing the petitioner, within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 4th respondent Village Officer to give sufficient reports required under the Act and the Rules to the 2nd respondent or the officer authorised under Section 2(XVA) of the Act, without further delay.
iv) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to declare that the petitioner’s property is not suitable for paddy cultivation and has to be removed from the data bank.
v) Dispense with the filing of the tra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.