SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5167

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
REJITHA R – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY NEENDAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1529 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.AKHILA BABU
For the Respondents: SMT.BHANU THILAK, SHRI.S.R.PRASANTH, SHRI.VISHNU.R, SMT.AISWARYA KRISHNAN, SMT.APARNA S.

Legal authorities must enforce eviction orders regarding unauthorized encroachments on government land without delay, as mandated by applicable statutes.

Headnote:Relevant statutes include the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, CRZ Notification of 2019, and the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules of 2017. The writ petition seeks enforcement of eviction orders against unauthorized construction by the 6th respondent on government land. The court determines that proceedings should be expedited based on directives from the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions. The central issue is whether statutory authorities are required to act after a prior stay was dismissed, with the court affirming their duty to act expeditiously.

Table of Content
1. writ petition for enforcement of eviction orders. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs prompt action based on tribunal's instructions. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

a) “Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding respondents 1 to 5 to forthwith implement and enforce the statutory demolition and eviction orders issued against the 6th respondent in respect of the unauthorised construction and illegal encroachment on Government puramboke land forming part of Ashtamudi Lake in Survey No.115/14 of Neendakara Village, Karunagappally Taluk;

b) Declare that the continued occupation and construction by the 6th respondent on the said land is illegal, unauthorised and violative of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act , Kerala Panchayat Building Rules , CRZ Notification , 2019 and the Wetlands (Conservation and Management)

Rules, 2017;

c) Declare that there is no subsisting stay or legal protection in favour of the 6th respondent after the dismissal of the interim stay and final findings recorded by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions in Appeal No.425/2024, and that the statutory authorities are bound to act without further delay;

d) Issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2 to 5 to provide all necessary administrative and police assistance to the 1st respondent Panchayat for the effective removal of the encroachment and demolition of unauthorised structures raised by the 6th respondent;

e) Direct the respondents to restore the encroached portion of Ashtamudi Lake to its original status, free from all unauthorised constructions and obstructions, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court;

f) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the competent authorities to initiate appropriate proceedings against the 6th respondent for having obtained interim relief by suppression of material facts and false declarations, and for illegal occupation of protected wetland land;

g) Issue such other and further orders or directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice, environmental protection and rule of law;

h) Award the costs of this writ petition to the petitioner.” [sic]

2. The main prayer in this writ petition is to implement and enforce the statutory demolition and eviction orders issued against the 6th respondent in respect of the unauthorised construction and illegal encroachment of Government puramboke land, which is the part of the Ashtamudi lake in Survey No. 115/14 of Neendakara Village, Karunagappally Taluk.

3. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel for the Panchayat submitted that the initial order of demolition was challenged before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions and the same is set aside and the Panchayat is directed to issue fresh orders in accordance with law. If that is the case, the Panchayat can be directed to complete the proceedings within a time frame, in accordance with law.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions :

1) The 1st respondent is directed to complete the proceedings as directed by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top