Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOHNY A.T – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the writ petition seeks to quash the order rejecting the form-5 application under conservation rules. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the arguments presented by the petitioner's counsel highlight the lack of consideration by the authorized officer. (Para 3) |
| 3. the court emphasizes the necessity for compliance with statutory inspection requirements. (Para 4) |
| 4. the ruling clarifies the standards required for evaluating land suitability for exclusion from data bank. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" (i) call for the records leading to the passing of Ext.P4 by the 1st respondent and quash the same by the issue of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction;
(ii) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to reconsider Ext- P3 application submitted by the petitioner in Form No.5 of the Act after putting him on notice and affording to him an opportunity of being heard and obtaining appropriate inputs from the KSREC;
(iii) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to correct the erroneous entries in the data bank by deleting the petitioner’s property mentioned in Ext.P1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
