Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
VAKKOM PADINJARE MUSLIM JAMA-ATH CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for review under article 226 (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments on review powers (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. powers of the waqf board and statutory remedies (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioners, namely, Vakkom Padinjare Muslim Jama-
ath, which is a waqf registered with the 1st respondent Kerala State Waqf Board, its President and General Secretary, have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent Kerala State Waqf Board to accept and consider Ext.P5 review petition. Ext.P5 review petition is one filed by the petitioners herein, along with two others, invoking the provisions under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking review of Ext.P3 order dated 18.12.2025 of the State Waqf Board in I.A.No.182 of 2025 in O.P.No.108 of 2023.
2. Heard arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned Standing Counsel for Kerala State Waqf Board for the respondents.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that the State Waqf Board is having inherent powers to review Ext.P3 order dated 18.12.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
