SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 930

B. R. GAVAI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
Pharmacy Council Of India – Appellant
Versus
Rajeev College Of Pharmacy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the parties Mr. Siddharth R. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Mr. Zoheb Hossain, AOR Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, AOR Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Mr. R.K. Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shashank Shekhar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rahul Verma, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Singh, AOR Mr. Vinay Navare, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samrat Krishnarao Shinde, AOR Mr. Pai Amit, AOR Mr. Ashwin Kumar D.S., Adv. Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, Adv. Mr. Omkar Kambi, Adv. Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Suraj Naik, Adv. Mr. Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv. Mr. Rohit R. Saboo, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Komal Mundhra, Adv. Mr. Revant Solanki, Adv Mr. Harsh Pandey, Adv. Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. Vishal Banshal, Adv. Ms. Rajeshwari Shankar, Adv. Mr. Niroop Sukrithy, Adv. Mohd. Ovais, Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mt. Md. Apzal Ansari, Adv. Mr. Gautam Narayan, AOR Mr. S.N. Bhat, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.P. Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Tarun Kumar Thakur, Adv. Ms. Parvati Bhat, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, AOR Mr. Shivam Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravikant, Adv. Mr. Mayank Manish, Adv. Mr. Chandarshekhar Singh, Adv. Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. Mr. C.P. Rajwar, Adv. Mr. Pushkar Anand, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Binisa Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Arya Tripathy, Adv. Ms. Priti Kumari, Adv. Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Sinha, AOR Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Mr. Kaushal Yadav, AOR Mr. Nandlal Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Shafik Ahmed, Adv. Ms. Yashoda Katiyar, Adv. Mr. Gourave Kumar Agarwal, AOR Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Adv. Mr. Ekansh Bansal, Adv. Mr. Vibhav Mishra, Adv. Mr. Deepak Khatri, Adv. Mr. Parmanand Gaur, AOR Ms. Beena S. Patnaik, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, AOR

JUDGMENT :

B.R. GAVAI, J.

1. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.

2. The appeals filed by the Pharmacy Council of India (hereinafter referred to as “PCI”) mainly challenge the (i) judgments dated 9th November 2021, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Writ Appeal No. 746-748 of 2020; (ii) judgment dated 7th March 2022, passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (Civil) No.175 of 2021; and (iii) judgment dated 22nd April 2022, passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Writ Petition (Civil) No.3766 of 2021. Several interim orders passed by these Courts during the pendency of these matters are also subject to challenge in some of the appeals. They are also being disposed of by the present judgment.

3. By the said judgments and orders, the aforesaid three High Courts of Karnataka, Delhi and Chhattisgarh had allowed the writ petitions filed by the respondents-institutions, which were, in turn, filed challenging the Resolutions/communications of the appellant-PCI dated 17th July 2019 and 9th September 2019 and dismissed the Writ Appeals filed by the P

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top