IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
TOM JOSE – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers:
a) “issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writs, directions or orders calling for the records leading upto Exhibits P10 and quash the same;
b) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, directions or orders compelling the respondents to correct the classification of the property of the petitioner as Purayidom/dry land instead of “Paddy Field” or “Nilam”in the Data Bank and as sought for by the petitioner in Exhibit P3;
c) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, directions or orders restraining the respondents from further proceeding against the petitioner in respect of the land of the petitioner under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and the Rules made thereunder;
d) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, directions or orders directing the 3rd respondent to exclude the land of the petitioner from the Land Data Bank and since the data bank has already been finalised by the 3rd respondent directing him to issue corrigendum notification showing the exclusion of the land of the petitioner from the data bank and publish the said corrigendum notification in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.