IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
REJI VARGHESE Y. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers:
(i) “To call for the records leading to Ext.P7 and P9 and the orders from the Respondents and issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate, writ, order or direction quashing Ext.P7 and P9 orders of the Respondents wrongly including 7.24 Ares of Property comprised in Re-Sy.No:184/3 in Block No:1 of Puthoor Village in the Data Bank and thereby declining to correct the entries contained in the Data Bank and in the BTR and to accept land tax from the Petitioner.
(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the Respondents to allow Ext P8 application submitted by the petitioner in Form-5 in Rule 4(D) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy and Wet Land Rules, 2008 in the light of Ext P5 and P6 and ground realities and correct the entries contained in the Data Bank in respect of 7.24 Ares of Property comprised in Re-Sy.No:184/3 in Block No:1 of Puthoor Village in the Data Bank and correct the entries in the BTR and to accept land tax from the Petitioner.
(iii) To declare that the petitioner is entitled to get allow the application in Form-5 in Rule 4(D) of the Kerala Conservati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.