IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
MUHAMMED MUBIN – Appellant
Versus
KERALA GRAMIN BANK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suspicion leading to account freezing must involve communication with the account holder. (Para 1) |
| 2. bank must follow established guidelines in managing suspected accounts. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court mandates the bank to provide transaction details to the petitioner. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
1. The learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after getting instructions, submitted that the account of the Petitioner is kept as a Mule Account on account of certain suspicious transactions in the account.
2. This Court in Abdul Azeez v. Union of India [2025 KLT OnLine 3447]
considered the question of whether the Bank has the right or authority to freeze the accounts of its account holders on the basis of suspicion with respect to the transactions in the account by itself in the absence of any requisition to do so from a law enforcement agency. This Court held that till the time the RBI comes forward with a Standard Operating Procedure for the Banks to deal with suspicious accounts, the following guidelines are to be followed when the Bank entertains suspicion about the operation of the account.
1. If the Bank is having reason to believe suspicious transactions in the account, th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.