SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5659

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
MUHAMMED MUBIN – Appellant
Versus
KERALA GRAMIN BANK – Respondent


Table of Content
1. suspicion leading to account freezing must involve communication with the account holder. (Para 1)
2. bank must follow established guidelines in managing suspected accounts. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court mandates the bank to provide transaction details to the petitioner. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

1. The learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after getting instructions, submitted that the account of the Petitioner is kept as a Mule Account on account of certain suspicious transactions in the account.

2. This Court in Abdul Azeez v. Union of India [2025 KLT OnLine 3447]

considered the question of whether the Bank has the right or authority to freeze the accounts of its account holders on the basis of suspicion with respect to the transactions in the account by itself in the absence of any requisition to do so from a law enforcement agency. This Court held that till the time the RBI comes forward with a Standard Operating Procedure for the Banks to deal with suspicious accounts, the following guidelines are to be followed when the Bank entertains suspicion about the operation of the account.

1. If the Bank is having reason to believe suspicious transactions in the account, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top