IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
LIGY ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks writ remedies regarding property status under paddy land law. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court evaluates proceedings and representatives' arguments. (Para 3) |
| 3. court finds statutory non-compliance in the decision. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“ (i) Issue a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records leading to Ext.P8 and quashing the same in the interest of justice;
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent no 3 to 6 to remove the petitioner’s property comprised in Survey Nos. 131/5, 132/10, 132/11-3 and 132/2-4 of Kalady Village, Aluva Taluk, from the Data Bank in the interest of justice;
iii) Declare that the petitioner’s property, having been converted prior to the commencement of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 , is not a paddy land or wetland as defined under the Act in the interest of justice;
iv) Pass such other and further orders as are deemed just and necessary in the interest of justice.
v) To dispense with the English translation of the Exhibits in the above writ petition in the interest of justice.
AND vi) To pass
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.