IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
T P SETHUMADHAVAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2885 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition seeks mandamus for application consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court allows the petition and outlines directives for timely responses. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : “i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 5th respondent to submit report on Ext. P3 application as called for by the 2nd Respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
iii) Issue of writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the 5th Respondent to make necessary corrections in the BTR, Thandaper register and Form 10 register within a period of 1 month after obtaining orders from the 2nd Respondent or the officer authorized under section
2(XVA) of the Act.
iv) To dispense the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
v) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. “ [sic]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 application submitted in Form 7 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 .
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.
Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
1) The 5th and 6th respondents are directed to submit necessary report based on Ext.P3 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2) Once the report is received, the 3rd respondent/competent authority shall consider Ext.P3, (if it is pending and if it is in order) as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four months from the date of receipt of the report from the 5, compliance. and 6th respondents.
3) The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment before the 3rd, 5th and 6th respondents for Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of Judgment
29/01/2026
Judgment dictated
29/01/2026
Draft judgment placed
30/01/2026
Final judgment uploaded
02/02/2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.