SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5681

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
T P SETHUMADHAVAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2885 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.FARHANA K.H., SHRI.MUHASIN K.M.
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Failure to comply with administrative responsibilities in processing land application.

Headnote:The writ petition seeks a mandamus, directing the second respondent to act on an application submitted under section 2(XVA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The court allows the prayer for consideration of the application. The court directs timely reporting and responses from relevant authorities as specified in the judgment. The final outcome directs the competent authority to expeditiously consider the application within specified timelines.

Table of Content
1. writ petition seeks mandamus for application consideration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court allows the petition and outlines directives for timely responses. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : “i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 5th respondent to submit report on Ext. P3 application as called for by the 2nd Respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

iii) Issue of writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the 5th Respondent to make necessary corrections in the BTR, Thandaper register and Form 10 register within a period of 1 month after obtaining orders from the 2nd Respondent or the officer authorized under section

2(XVA) of the Act.

iv) To dispense the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.

v) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. “ [sic]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 application submitted in Form 7 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 .

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1) The 5th and 6th respondents are directed to submit necessary report based on Ext.P3 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2) Once the report is received, the 3rd respondent/competent authority shall consider Ext.P3, (if it is pending and if it is in order) as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four months from the date of receipt of the report from the 5, compliance. and 6th respondents.

3) The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment before the 3rd, 5th and 6th respondents for Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS

Judgment reserved NA
Date of Judgment 29/01/2026
Judgment dictated 29/01/2026
Draft judgment placed 30/01/2026
Final judgment uploaded 02/02/2026
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top