SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5682

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SASIDARAN M – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2887 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI, SMT.MINI.K.NAIR, SMT.AAFINA SANTHOSH, SMT.ABHIRAMI G. NAIR
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Writs can compel timely action on administrative applications under specific regulations.

Headnote:The writ petition was filed under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008, seeking directions for timely consideration of an application. The court permitted the petitioners' requests for expedited reporting and processing. Key issues included compliance timelines for respondent actions and duties to consider submitted applications. The final outcome mandated report submission and consideration within specified timeframes.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed for administrative action. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court allows petitioners' requests. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : “i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 2nd respondent/Authorized Officer to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 application within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 5th respondent to submit report as called for from the 2nd respondent/ Authorized Officer within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

iii) Dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.

iv) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. “ [sic]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that they will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 application submitted in Form 6 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1) The 5th respondent is directed to submit necessary report based on Ext.P4 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2) Once the report is received, the 3rd respondent/competent authority shall consider Ext.P4, (if it is pending and if it is in order) as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four months from the date of receipt of the report from the 5th respondent.

3) The petitioners will produce a certified copy of this judgment before the 3rd and 5th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top