IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
REENA SOJAN KURIAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOTTAYAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
“i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the 2nd respondent to call for report from the 4th respondent within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
iii) To dispense with the production of the translation of vernacular documents.
iv) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case “ [sic]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 application submitted in Form 6 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.
Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
1) The 4th respondent is directed to submit necessary report based on Ext.P3 as expeditiously as possib
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.