SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5684

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOHN VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER FORT KOCHI – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2921 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SUJITH MATHEW JOSE
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Timeliness and procedural adherence in administrative decisions concerning land applications are critical under established statutory frameworks.

Headnote:The writ petition was filed under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008, seeking mandamus for the consideration of Ext.P3 Form-5 application concerning discrepancies in the data bank of Chowara Grama Panchayat. The court, upon hearing both parties, allowed the petition with directives for prompt reporting and action by relevant authorities, ensuring compliance within specified timelines.

Table of Content
1. the application for land correction must be addressed promptly. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the court is willing to consider procedural validity. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

“ i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding competent among respondents 1 and 2 to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 Form-5 application in the light of the law laid down by this Honble Court and to make necessary corrections in the data bank of Chowara Grama Panchayat by deleting the land covered by Ext P3 Form-5 application, within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

ii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of this case including the cost of this Writ Petition.

iii) To dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents “ [sic]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 application submitted in Form 5 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1) The 3rd respondent is directed to submit necessary report based on Ext.P3 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2) Once the report is received, the 2nd respondent/competent authority shall consider Ext.P3, (if it is pending and if it is in order) as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of the report from the 3rd respondent.

3) The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment before the 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.

sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS

Judgment reserved NA
Date of Judgment 29/01/2026
Judgment dictated 29/01/2026
Draft judgment placed 30/01/2026
Final judgment uploaded 02/02/2026
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY THE CURRENT LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT, DATED

22.12.2025 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE DATA BANK OF SREEMOOLANAGRAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, DATED NIL SHOWING THE SY NO.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top