SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5686

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SAFIYA AGED 71 YEARS W/O LATE MOHAMMED KUNJI – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2979 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PHIJO PRADEESH PHILIP, SHRI.JUNAID.V.S, SMT.ANNS MARY JOSEPH
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

The court directed timely consideration of applications under environmental regulations, ensuring compliance within specified timeframes.

Headnote:This judgment relates to WP

(C) No. 2979 of 2026 concerning a petitioner's application under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The petitioner sought a writ for expeditious disposal of her application. The Court acknowledged the petitioner's request and ordered a report from the Village Officer within a month, with a mandate for the competent authority to consider the application within four months thereafter. The Court emphasized the need for timely administrative actions.

Table of Content
1. judicial application processing timelines. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's directive for timely compliance. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

“(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose Exhibit P2 application within such time fixed by this Honorable Court, in the interest of justice;

(ii) To dispense with the production of English translation of Malayalam Exhibits produced along with the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

(iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case “ [sic]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 application submitted in Form 6 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1) The 2nd respondent is directed to submit necessary report based on Ext.P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2) Once the report is received, the 1st respondent/competent authority shall consider Ext.P2, (if it is pending and if it is in order) as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four months from the date of receipt of the report from the

2nd respondent.

3) The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment before the 1st and 2nd respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top