IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SAFIYA AGED 71 YEARS W/O LATE MOHAMMED KUNJI – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
“(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose Exhibit P2 application within such time fixed by this Honorable Court, in the interest of justice;
(ii) To dispense with the production of English translation of Malayalam Exhibits produced along with the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.
(iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case “ [sic]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 application submitted in Form 6 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.
Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
1) The 2nd respondent is directed to submit necessary report based on Ext.P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this jud
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.