IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JINESH MATHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“I. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or such other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records and proceedings leading up to the issuance of Exhibit P5 order and quash the same;
II. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the 2nd respondent to allow Exhibit P2 application on the basis of the entry shown in Exhibit P1 data bank as dry land and Exhibit P6 satellite report and in the light of the settled position of law as laid down by various cases of this Hon'ble Court;
III. To dispense with the filing of the translated versions of the vernacular documents; and IV. To issue such other order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;”
[SIC]
2. The petitioner filed a Form 5 application in accordance to the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (for short ‘Rules’). The same was rejected by the authoised officer, and the petitioner challenges the same before this Court by filing W.P.(C.) No.40724/2023. This Court, as per Ext.P4 judgment set aside that orde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.