IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SONY THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Call for the records leading to Exts-P2 and P7 and may be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari and set aside the same in the interest of justice.
ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order, or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to take up Ext P4 again and to dispose of the same on merits, within specified time limits as may be fixed by this Hon’ble court, in the manner as is directed in Ext-P8 and similar judgments of this Hon’ble court, interest of justice.
iii) To exempt the petitioner from production of the translated copies of the documents in vernacular language.
AND iv) To pass any such or further orders as the petitioner may seek and this Hon’ble Court deem fit to grant.” [SIC]
2. The petitioner filed Form-5 applications twice under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity), for removing his property from the Data Bank. The petitioner is aggrieved by Exts.P2 and P7 orders passed by the 2nd respondent rejecting the Form–5 applications submitted by him. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the authorised officer has not considered
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.