IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOSEPH PHILIP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash order rejecting land exclusion. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hears arguments from both parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. court observes non-compliance with statutory requirements. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit P6 and P9 and to quash the same to the extent they refuse to remove the subject lands from data bank.
b) Issue a declaration that the lands having an extent of 80 Ares in Re-survey No. 103/2-2 in Block No.8 in Aymanam Village and the pond constructed in the applied lands for pisciculture are not paddy lands as defined in Section 2 (xii) of the 2008 Act.
c) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order directing the 2nd respondent to pass fresh orders removing the lands involved in Exhibit P5, application in Form 5, in view of the existence of coconut trees aged 15 years, bunds and large pond constructed for pisciculture.
d) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order directing the 5th respondent to submit a factual report on the status of the applied lands as on date and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.