IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BEENA P J – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash Exhibit- P7 order passed by the 7 th respondent;
ii) a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to allow change of nature of land of the petitioner’s property covered by Ext P1 as applied for by her in Form 6 application dated 30.03.2021;
iii) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and allow this petition with all costs.
iv) It is also prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispense with the production of translation of vernacular documents produced in the writ petition. ”
[SIC]
2. The petitioner filed a Form 6 application, in accordance with the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008, and the same was originally rejected as per Ext.P3. The petitioner challenged the same by filing an appeal, as evident by Ext.P4. Thereafter the appeal was dismissed as per Ext.P5 order. The petitioner challenged Exts.P3 and P5 before this Court by filing WP(C) No.3669/2024. This Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.