IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SOBIN THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i). Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records leading to Ext.P5 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable.
(ii). Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7 Form 5 application submitted by the petitioner, in the light of Ext.P3 order relating to the adjacent property and Ext.P8 KSRSEC report, within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
(iii). Declare that the petitioner’s property having an extent of 4.05 Ares in Re.Sy.No.394/4-1 of Thrikkodithanam Village, Changanassery Taluk, is not a paddy land or suitable for paddy cultivation as on the date of commencement of Act 28 of 2008, and hence liable to be excluded from the Data Bank.
(iv) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to dispense with production of translation of malayalam documents (v). Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. ”
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting the Form
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.