IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
A.J.JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court referred to existing judgments for dismissal. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“1. Issue a writ of mandamus of other appropriate writ order or direction to the 3rd respondents to entertain Ext.P3 and Ext.P4 applications submitted by the petitioner for renewal of permit on the route Punalur – Keezpally as LSOS without insisting the curtailment of the route length to less than 140 Kms, in view of the dictum laid down in KSRTC Vs. Saju Varkey and Or and also the judgment dated 1.08.2025 in WP(C) No. 39608 of 2024 and connected cases, rendered by this Hon’ble Court and grant renewal of permit as sought for by the petitioner.
2. Grant the petitioners such other reliefs which this Hon’ble court deem just and fit in the circumstance of the case.”
2 . The learned Government Pleader brings to my notice Ext.R4 (a) proceedings of the RTA, Kottayam, held on 30.05.2013, which records that two permits granted in favour of the petitioner were surrendered for cancellation for the issuance of clearance to other authorities.
3. The learned Standing Counsel for the KSRTC submits that, in any view of the matter, the relief sought cannot be gra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.