Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
SHYAM V.S. – Appellant
Versus
SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging preliminary orders under cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. requirements for validity of jurisdictional orders. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. final ruling on preliminary order quash. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
Dated this the 02nd day of February, 2026 This Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed by the petitioner challenging Annexure A1 preliminary order in M.C.No.94 of 2021 dated 09.11.2021 issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Muvattupuzha, under Section 111 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.).
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Sub Divisional Magistrate had, in a rather mechanical exercise of jurisdiction, issued a preliminary order under Section 111 of Cr.P.C. against the petitioner. There has been no proper application of mind and the mandatory requirements to be complied with before proceeding to issue a preliminary order under Section 111 have not been met. The legal stipulation that the substance of information, based on which the proceedings are initiated, should be explained in an order issued under Section 111 Cr.P.C. has not been met while iss
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
