Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHIBIN MUHAMMED K – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALAKKAD DISTRICT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks mandamus for land application consideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel indicates satisfaction with direction for application review. (Para 2) |
| 3. the court sets timelines for report and application consideration. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
“(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P4 application submitted by the petitioner.
(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order declaring that the petitioner is entitled to utilize the property for residential, commercial, or other purposes in accordance with law.
(iii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondents to take necessary steps to reclassify the property in the Revenue Records in accordance with law.
(iv) To grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the interest of justice, including costs. “
[sic]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ex
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
