IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHIBIN MUHAMMED K – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALAKKAD DISTRICT – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
“(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P4 application submitted by the petitioner.
(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order declaring that the petitioner is entitled to utilize the property for residential, commercial, or other purposes in accordance with law.
(iii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondents to take necessary steps to reclassify the property in the Revenue Records in accordance with law.
(iv) To grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the interest of justice, including costs. “
[sic]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 application submitted in Form 5 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.
Therefore, this writ petition is di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.