Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JASEELA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (R.R) THRISSUR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's grievances about land classification and procedural adherence. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's initial reception of the arguments and context. (Para 3) |
| 3. failure to adhere to statutory inspection requirements by the authority. (Para 4) |
| 4. necessary criteria for land assessment were established and cited cases. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Call for the records relating to Ext. P6 order of the
1st Respondent Deputy Collector (R.R) Thrissur and to quash the same order by issuing a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writs, Orders or Directions.
ii. Declare that the property of the Petitioner having an extent of 19.2 Ares, split up into 2 extents of 2.2 Ares comprised in Re-Sy. No. 308/3-1 and 17 Ares comprised in Re-Sy. No. 308/3-2 situated at Block 30, Oorakam Village, at Thrissur Taluk in Thrissur District, covered by Ext.P6 application is dry/garden land, having all the characterisation of Purayidam and therefore the inclusion of 19.2 Ares of the property in the data bank is liable to be excluded.
iii. Issue such other and further writs, orders or directions as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstance
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
